PREDATOR 2
Verdict: 2.5/5 stars
REVIEW BY JOHN ULMER
The problem with most sequels is that they lack their predecessor(s)'
creativity and freshness. Take "Predator 2" for example: The entire notion
of being trapped by an indestructible murderous creature in a world unknown
to you is put to waste by moving the Predator to the urban jungle of LA,
where cop Harrigan (Danny Glover), a drug enforcement officer, hunts down
the Predator on his own turf. This isn't too bad of an idea, as the city
grants the agile and almost invisible Predator room to hurl himself from
building to building above the skyline at night, picking off prey in stealth
and hanging them from the top of buildings, skinned alive, just like he did
with Dutch's (Arnold Schwarzenegger) commando team, only there they were in
Columbia and had only trees to be hung on.
That doesn't happen here. "Predator 2" moves slowly like it doesn't know
what it's doing. It rarely shows the invisible Predator stalking its prey
above the below--instead, it shows him walk into a moving subway train and
slice and dice everyone. This isn't scary. This isn't even really all that
fun. The entire greatness and pure genius of the first film was the way it
took its time getting to the Predator, and when it did you were scared of
the idea of a creature like that.
The film starts with a painfully stupid action sequence that looks like a
game of "Grand Theft Auto III" gone awry. A gang has held up a street
outside a building, blasting away their super-duper machine guns at the cops
on the street, who act as if there's nothing they can do about it. (Getting
snipers on top of a building and picking off the idiots might be a good
idea.)
Enter Harrigan (Glover), the man who knows exactly what to do. What he does,
Reader, is ridiculous, but I won't ruin it. Anyway, before he has a chance
to send his team of men into a large skyscraper where there are more gang
folks hiding, an invisible Predator murders them (the gang, that is) and
hangs them from the ceiling in a ritualistic pattern right before Harrigan
and his team arrive.
Thinking it's a new gang leader on the streets trying to make a name for
himself, Harrigan shrugs off the startling incident--until it happens again.
A young, eager rookie (Bill Paxton) joins his team and they put a manhunt in
effect for whatever is out there killing gangs and pretty much anyone with
weapons.
I get tired when films repeatedly use the futuristic look of "Metropolis"
and "Dark City," but if there were ever a film that needed that edge it
would be "Predator 2." It is, of course, lacking it. The film's Predator
sequences should all have taken place at night, showing glimpses of him
perched high above skyscrapers, totally indestructible and invincible.
This film has no tension, no wonder. It's rarely an improvement over the
first in terms of the creature--sure, we get to see new weapons, but they've
totally screwed up his sound effects and POV. (What's with the red junk on
the left? The other Predator didn't have it. In the videogame it's his
health counter, but I doubt an advanced life form would need to know if he's
dying or not by looking at a meter.)
I have respect for Danny Glover, I really do. He's one of my favorite
actors. He is good at playing the overwhelmed (or under-whelmed) everyman
role, just like in "Lethal Weapon" (1987). That's why this role is wrong for
him. Very wrong. Watching him battle a merciless Predator species is just a
bit sad, while watching him run around panting is even sadder. Action roles
are good for him when he's got jokes to spit out or someone to roll eyes at
while he's trying to catch up (like Riggs and Murtaugh).
Plus, and I mean no respect to Danny Glover as I admire him so much, but
let's face it: When it comes to hardboiled action films about alien species
battling macho men, who else can play the role but Arnold? He was filming
"Total Recall" (1990) at the time and couldn't come back for a sequel. The
plot references him once--which I liked. I like when sequels reference their
predecessors. (Part of my love of "Back to the Future Part II" is because of
this.) But quite simply, "Predator 2" is lacking everything its predecessor
had.
Moving the Predator to an urban area could have given the filmmakers plenty
of fresh perspectives and ideas to catch. Plus, sequels are rarely allowed
to use the original theme song unless it's sort of remixed (see "RoboCop 2"
[1990]). "Predator 2" had full access to its original theme song by Alan
Silvestri, and it uses it in the entirely wrong places. Towards the end of
the film, there is an explosion and Glover jumps to the ground just like
Arnie did at the end of "Predator." When the camera comes back to him, it
doesn't use the end theme of "Predator" that plays in a subtle fashion when
Arnold is standing in the rubble with his hands on his sides, reflecting
back over the incidents. It was a perfect place to play it and they didn't.
They do, however, play it in the background at a funeral halfway through the
film.
Another thing that "Predator 2" is lacking is the heart. This film is
vile--everything the first film has, this doesn't. The first had swearing
but not too much; this has the F-word even spewing from the Predator
himself--a reference to the first film, but actually quite comical and not
as scary as it should be (remember one of the best lines of the first film,
when Arnold says, "You're one ugly mother__"? Danny Glover starts to say it
this time and the Predator finishes the sentence for him. Good reference,
perhaps, but also pretty stupid). This film also resorts to more gore,
nudity, sex, and so on than it really needed. It's like they're trying to
push past the first film's level of violence and make a real hard R-rated
film. It feels corny.
This movie opened the gateway for 2004's upcoming "Alien vs. Predator,"
presenting the fact that the Alien and Predator species live in the same
galaxy together. When Harrigan investigates inside a docked Predator ship,
there is an Alien skull clearly visible along with another creature, which I
thought was a T-Rex but have just now read is another alien species from the
second (and terrific) videogame. That's about all you can credit this film
for.
It leaves a lot open in terms of species exploration, but doesn't follow
through with any of it. I suppose it thought there would be room for the
sequels to delve into all the open discussions regarding Predators, but too
late. I admire the first "Predator" film very much. I admire the false
species itself, even more so than that in "Alien," simply because I think
they're a lot...well...cooler. They can use a light-bending trick to turn
practically invisible; they have masks that pick up heat forms; they have
advanced weaponry and really neat ways of killing people. I admire what the
first film started. I'm not sure I really admire what the second film cloes.
And while most sequels have a reason to be bad, "Predator 2" doesn't, and
though it left me grinning in some places, I was overall pretty
disappointed.
Note: I noticed in one scene that dialogue between Glover and Garey Busey
reflects a conversation in "Alien" (1979). Glover says, "You admire it."
Busey says, "I admire what it can give us." Sounds like the conversation
between Weaver and Holm, doesn't it? Also, here's a fun fact: Bill Paxton,
who appears in this film, also appears in many of James Cameron's films, as
does Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was, of course, in the original film.
- John Ulmer
Webmaster of The Movie Portal
http://www.wiredonmovies.com/
Updated daily, offers over one thousand free movie scripts and hundreds of
free reviews, plus posters, sounds, quotes, and more.
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 36233
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1214838
X-RT-TitleID: 1031425
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 2.5/5
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.