SHREK 2
-------
What's next after a happily ever after honeymoon? A visit with the
in-laws, the king (John Cleese) and queen (Julie Andrews) of the Kingdom of
Far Far Away present more obstacles for the ogreish love affair of Princess
Fiona (Cameron Diaz) and her new husband, "Shrek 2."
More of the same with less bite, "Shrek 2" continues to plunder other films
while introducing product placement and five major new characters who, with
one exception, add little to the proceedings. When it comes to sequels,
Dreamworks Animation is no Pixar. That's not to say there aren't pleasures
to be had in "Shrek 2," but most of them arrive at the film's conclusion
long after one has begun checking one's watch.
The film begins with a prologue which explains that Prince Charming (Rupert
Everett, "My Best Friend's Wedding") had been Fiona's intended all along,
but he arrived at the tower too late, well after Shrek and donkey had
braved the dragon and saved the princess. Meanwhile, the newlyweds have
arrived back at the swamp only to be summoned for a ball celebrating their
marriage by Fiona's parents, who are clearly expecting her to arrive with
Charming. Surprisingly, Shrek doesn't have mother-in-law problems - she's
actually supportive - but father-in-law is enraged and wants rid of his
ogreish son-in-law, so he heads to the Poison Apple pub to hire the
notorious hit man, Puss-in-Boots (Antonio Banderas, "Spy Kids 3"). It
turns out that the king has a secret pact with The Fairy Godmother
(Jennifer Saunders, TV's "Absolutely Fabulous"), who happens to be
Charming's mom. Meanwhile, Shrek foils Puss, who becomes his loyal
servant, and steals one of the Godmother's potent potions to ensure he and
Fiona will live happily ever after. Surprising results end up pitting
Shrek against Charming for Fiona's hand.
As in the original film, the story writers have fun spoofing films like
"The Lord of the Rings," "Spider-Man," "From Here to Eternity" and, most
successfully, "Mission Impossible." The first film's main problem is also
present in the sequel, though - a feeling of warmed over borrowings from
"The Princess Bride" joined this time with echoes of Pixar's "Monsters,
Inc." Farquaad's Disneyland kingdom is replaced with the Hollywood styled
Far Far Away with its stretch-carriages and hillside sign (not to mention
Barney's Old York, Gap Queen and Old Navery). Speaking of Farquaad, the
great John Cleese cannot enliven the King and Julie Andrews is nondescript
as the Queen. Jennifer Saunders gives a jaunty vocal performance to a
character that simply isn't enjoyable enough for the large amount of screen
time she's given. Everett breezes through his egotistical prince
impersonation, but the real addition is Banderas's Puss, an amusingly
animated creation who gets some of the film's biggest laughs (one really
rather naughty visual reference to self-stimulation will more than likely
fly over the heads of the kiddies). In smaller roles, the denizens of the
shady pub, the Poison Apple, are all entertaining from the Ugly Stepsister
who tends bar to patrons like the Headless Horseman and the piano-playing
Captain Hook. It should be noted that Fiona is pretty much relegated to
the sidelines for this outing, although the filmmakers have done a nice job
presenting the weirdness of a new husband staying in his bride's girlhood
bedroom (the "Sir Justin" poster pinned to her canopy is a cute in-joke).
"Shrek 2" finally revs into high gear for its race-to-the-finish ending,
which gleefully spoofs both the O.J. Simpson chase and TV's 'Cops,'
although the climax once again is reminiscent of Disney's "Beauty and the
Beast." The concluding musical number isn't as much fan as the original's,
even with Puss joining Donkey on vocals, but stick around for a
semi-amusing epilogue which follows the credits.
B-
For more Reeling reviews visit http://www.reelingreviews.com
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 37822
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1282564
X-RT-TitleID: 1132597
X-RT-SourceID: 386
X-RT-AuthorID: 1487
X-RT-RatingText: B-
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.