Planet Sick-Boy: http://www.sick-boy.com
"We Put the SIN in Cinema"
© Copyright 2004 Planet Sick-Boy. All Rights Reserved.
If there's one thing I'm sure of, it's that Van Helsing isn't even remotely
disappointing. Then again, I suppose that proclamation would hinge on your
preconceived notions about the film. If you're expecting a choppy,
soulless, meandering dud that represents everything that's wrong with the
current state of the summer blockbuster, how could you possibly be
disappointed by something as grotesquely unwatchable as Van Helsing?
Van Helsing's action (and, sadly, its inaction, as well) take place in the
late 19th century, mostly in and around the Greater Transylvania area, which
has been tormented by vampires for the better part of the last few decades.
One important family is about to see their bloodline wiped out, and that's
why the Vatican sends the Indiana Jones-ish Van Helsing (Hugh Jackman, X2)
over the Carpathians to put an end to all of the bloodsucking nonsense.
He gets there about three minutes after Dracula's three brides/henchmen come
to finish off Anna, the last of the Valerious family. Three minutes after
that, Anna is "accidentally" sitting on VH's face - the surest first sign of
a bullshit Hollywood screen romance. What follows is a numbing, frustrating
ebb and flow of Big, Fake-Looking Set Pieces unwisely juxtaposed with
Mindless, Inconsequential Dialogue Scenes That Make You Long For Gods &
Generals. Van Helsing could have been in Portuguese and it wouldn't have
made one difference (aside from potentially increasing the box office take
in Portugal and Brazil).
It's tough to pick a spot to start blasting away at Van Helsing, which works
much better as a poster than a film. The very premise - VH battling
Dracula, the Frankenstein monster and werewolves - sounds cool on paper, but
in the godless hands of writer-director Stephen Sommers (The Mummy Returns),
it's about as exciting as watching C-SPAN. The changes he makes are as
insipid and uninspired (Frank is a Rhodes scholar! Drac looks like Furio
from The Sopranos!) as the parts of the flick he "borrows" from other,
better works: VH, like Jackman's Logan, doesn't know who or what he is;
Dracula is concerned with a power source to feed the millions of Matrix-like
pods full of his unborn minions; VH's sidekick (David Wenham, The Return of
the King) may as well have been called Q; Mr. Hyde (Harry Potter's Robbie
Coltrane) looks and sounds just like Shrek.
Sommers is a horrible director, but he's even worse when it comes to
writing. Why does he show a full moon, and men turning into werewolves, and
then have a character say, "The full moon is in two days"? Why does he
never explain the convenient thunderstorms that always seem to pop up
whenever the Frankenstein experiments take place? Why is there always a
really long rope hanging around whenever somebody needs to swing away to
safety (I know Van Helsing is just a big videogame, but I didn't think it
was Pitfall)? What happened to getting the werewolf antidote into its
target by the 12th peal of the midnight bell? I won't even ask where the
nipples on Dracula's brides went because I think I know - the costumes from
Batman Forever.
The last time somebody tried to combine a bunch of literary characters into
one film, we got a dud called The League of Extraordinary Gentleman, which,
ironically, featured Van Helsing's Dracula (Richard Roxburgh). The last
time somebody tried to cram more than one monsterish antagonist into one
film, we got a dud called Underworld, which, ironically, featured Van
Helsing's Anna (Kate Beckinsale). See the pattern? And consider this: The
one-note Jackman has never carried a feature, nor shown the slightest
ability that he could do so. Beckinsale has yet to appear in anything
somebody could call "a good film" and is nothing but eye candy here as she
intermittently leaps between playing Anna as Lana Lang and Sarah Connor,
only with a pizzeria accent. Sommers dropped the ball by not allowing Anna
to duke it out with the Drac Bride played by Josie Maran, if only to serve
my masturbatory drive.
Van Helsing also features a score that will make you want to sock whoever is
sitting next to you out of sheer irritation, as well as an ending that may
induce more unintentional laughter than Dubya saying he answered all of the
9/11 commission's questions. The film's only saving grace would have been
to slap a Where Are They Now? coda on the end of the story, letting us know
that the Frankenstein monster is still reeling from the negative reviews he
received in Hollywood Homicide.
2:13 - PG-13 for nonstop creature action violence and frightening images,
and for sensuality
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 37729
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1278269
X-RT-TitleID: 1132255
X-RT-SourceID: 595
X-RT-AuthorID: 1146
X-RT-RatingText: 2/10
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.