Movies A-Z | Celebs | SiteMap | DVD | Advanced Search
   Home
 
   Movie Database News    In Theaters    Coming Soon    Future Movies    BoxOffice     Trailers     Scripts     Wallpapers     Directory  
  Home - Van Helsing review

Van Helsing (2004)

User Rating
48%
(393 votes)
Critic Rating
51%
(26 reviews)
OverviewReviewsCommentsDVDsPhotosTrailersForumProduction InfoAdd to MyMovies 

Quotes (109)
Trivia (2)
Plot Description
Soundtrack
Wallpapers
Shooting Locations
Popularity

Directed by
Stephen Sommers

Written by
Stephen Sommers

Cast
Hugh Jackman, Kate Beckinsale, Richard Roxburgh, David Wenham, Shuler Hensley [more]


Release Date
• USA: May 7, 2004
• UK: 7 May 2004
DVD Release Date
• R1: Oct 19, 2004
• R2: 11 Oct 2004

Budget $95,000,000
BoxOffice: $99.9M

Official Website:
Van Helsing Website

MPAA Rating
Rated PG-13 for nonstop creature action violence and frightening images, and for sensuality.

Running Time
2 hours, 12 minutes

Country USA, Czech Republic

Production Companies
Carpathian Pictures, Universal Pictures, Stillking Films, The Sommers Company

Studio Sommers Company Production, Stephen Sommers Film, Universal

More info on IMDb.com

Other Titles
• Van Helsing (2004)



Sign up for our Newsletter!
Movie news in your email:

Your Name:

Your E-Mail Address:



Review of Van Helsing (2004) by Jon Popick

Planet Sick-Boy: http://www.sick-boy.com

"We Put the SIN in Cinema"

© Copyright 2004 Planet Sick-Boy. All Rights Reserved.

If there's one thing I'm sure of, it's that Van Helsing isn't even remotely

disappointing. Then again, I suppose that proclamation would hinge on your

preconceived notions about the film. If you're expecting a choppy,

soulless, meandering dud that represents everything that's wrong with the

current state of the summer blockbuster, how could you possibly be

disappointed by something as grotesquely unwatchable as Van Helsing?

Van Helsing's action (and, sadly, its inaction, as well) take place in the

late 19th century, mostly in and around the Greater Transylvania area, which

has been tormented by vampires for the better part of the last few decades.

One important family is about to see their bloodline wiped out, and that's

why the Vatican sends the Indiana Jones-ish Van Helsing (Hugh Jackman, X2)

over the Carpathians to put an end to all of the bloodsucking nonsense.

He gets there about three minutes after Dracula's three brides/henchmen come

to finish off Anna, the last of the Valerious family. Three minutes after

that, Anna is "accidentally" sitting on VH's face - the surest first sign of

a bullshit Hollywood screen romance. What follows is a numbing, frustrating

ebb and flow of Big, Fake-Looking Set Pieces unwisely juxtaposed with

Mindless, Inconsequential Dialogue Scenes That Make You Long For Gods &

Generals. Van Helsing could have been in Portuguese and it wouldn't have

made one difference (aside from potentially increasing the box office take

in Portugal and Brazil).

It's tough to pick a spot to start blasting away at Van Helsing, which works

much better as a poster than a film. The very premise - VH battling

Dracula, the Frankenstein monster and werewolves - sounds cool on paper, but

in the godless hands of writer-director Stephen Sommers (The Mummy Returns),

it's about as exciting as watching C-SPAN. The changes he makes are as

insipid and uninspired (Frank is a Rhodes scholar! Drac looks like Furio

from The Sopranos!) as the parts of the flick he "borrows" from other,

better works: VH, like Jackman's Logan, doesn't know who or what he is;

Dracula is concerned with a power source to feed the millions of Matrix-like

pods full of his unborn minions; VH's sidekick (David Wenham, The Return of

the King) may as well have been called Q; Mr. Hyde (Harry Potter's Robbie

Coltrane) looks and sounds just like Shrek.

Sommers is a horrible director, but he's even worse when it comes to

writing. Why does he show a full moon, and men turning into werewolves, and

then have a character say, "The full moon is in two days"? Why does he

never explain the convenient thunderstorms that always seem to pop up

whenever the Frankenstein experiments take place? Why is there always a

really long rope hanging around whenever somebody needs to swing away to

safety (I know Van Helsing is just a big videogame, but I didn't think it

was Pitfall)? What happened to getting the werewolf antidote into its

target by the 12th peal of the midnight bell? I won't even ask where the

nipples on Dracula's brides went because I think I know - the costumes from

Batman Forever.

The last time somebody tried to combine a bunch of literary characters into

one film, we got a dud called The League of Extraordinary Gentleman, which,

ironically, featured Van Helsing's Dracula (Richard Roxburgh). The last

time somebody tried to cram more than one monsterish antagonist into one

film, we got a dud called Underworld, which, ironically, featured Van

Helsing's Anna (Kate Beckinsale). See the pattern? And consider this: The

one-note Jackman has never carried a feature, nor shown the slightest

ability that he could do so. Beckinsale has yet to appear in anything

somebody could call "a good film" and is nothing but eye candy here as she

intermittently leaps between playing Anna as Lana Lang and Sarah Connor,

only with a pizzeria accent. Sommers dropped the ball by not allowing Anna

to duke it out with the Drac Bride played by Josie Maran, if only to serve

my masturbatory drive.

Van Helsing also features a score that will make you want to sock whoever is

sitting next to you out of sheer irritation, as well as an ending that may

induce more unintentional laughter than Dubya saying he answered all of the

9/11 commission's questions. The film's only saving grace would have been

to slap a Where Are They Now? coda on the end of the story, letting us know

that the Frankenstein monster is still reeling from the negative reviews he

received in Hollywood Homicide.

2:13 - PG-13 for nonstop creature action violence and frightening images,

and for sensuality
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 37729
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1278269
X-RT-TitleID: 1132255
X-RT-SourceID: 595
X-RT-AuthorID: 1146
X-RT-RatingText: 2/10


NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.

 Other Usenet Reviews of Van Helsing (2004)







 Recommended Movies
Movie Title Agree Disagree
Salem's Lot (2004)
House of Frankenstein (1944)
Fright Night (1985)
Crow: Salvation, The (2000)
Underworld (2003)
Dracula 2000 (2000)
Dracula (1992)
Blade (1998)

Help us improve these results!
Mark the movies you think are similar by putting a checkmark under 'Agree' and hit Submit. Leave blank those you are not sure about.


Mooviees.com is not the official site for this film.
All editorial views and opinions expressed here are for entertainment purposes only.

 News Headlines
  • Paradox Plans A New "Kull" Film [Monday, Nov 23, 2009]
  • "Howling" Franchise Gets Rebooted [Monday, Nov 23, 2009]
  • Weitz Follows "New Moon" With "Gardener" [Monday, Nov 23, 2009]



  • DVD | Home | BoxOffice | All Celebs | All Movies | Release Schedule | In Production | In Theaters
    Coming Soon | Future Movies | Trailers | Scripts | Wallpapers | Directory | Advanced Search | Knihy
    Copyright ©2002 Mooviees.com All rights reserved.
    This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.