Shanghai Knights
Catch it on HBO
Lo, how the mighty have fallen. The Tuxedo aside, I am a Jackie Chan
fan. Between his genial aw-shucks personality, superhuman feats of
agility & creativity, and his comedic timing, what's not to love?
Paired with Owen Wilson, Chan gets to marry culture clash with witty
comedy. Shanghai Noon (this film's predecessor) was a fun romp of
comedy and adventure through the Old West. Knights takes place some
time later, but this time in Victorian England, where both our
hapless heroes are fish out of water. In addition, our
adversaries-cum-friends are now circling each other with levels of
distrust that seem faked in order to recreate their snappy chemistry
from the first time around. The film is low on action scenes,
mediumish on comedy, and high on getting these guys in touch with
their feelings about each other. The movie goes to so much trouble
to foster discontent, it then has to work doubly hard to bring it
back. Perhaps no buddy movie should ever be a sequel. The temptation
is irresistible; but the tension is gone and it's just yuk yuk
remember the days for 90 minutes. Noon won our hearts as two opposed
characters found their commonality through shared shenanigans.
Knights forces them to misunderstand each other so they have
something to do.
Don't get me wrong - Jackie's still got it. Notably, the sequel's
big action pieces are all direct and rather brilliant homages to
classic Hollywood set pieces. For all that Chan is rightfully
compared to Buster Keaton, he (or the choreographer?) clearly sat
down and watched countless hours of Charlie Chaplin movies before
making this one. Other great film moments are honored as well but
Chaplin is in every crevice. These sequences really are a delight,
and serve to emphasize how flat the remainder of the movie is.
Singing in the Rain and the Keystone Cops and other iconic moments
add laughs and tension. It's nice how differently the fights were
choreographed as a result - somewhat slower and more dancelike, but
entirely different, even more organic than other films' fights. Chan
fights with beauty and cleverness, humanity and humor, and that is
why we flock to see him. Wilson is the Jackie Chan of the verbal
riposte, and when he's not complaining about something he gets to do
a good deal of his moves as well, but it just doesn't gel.
Aiden Gillen as the Gary Oldman-wannabe villain Rathbone (ha ha)
woodenly struts his star-up IPO hair through the film, inviting
queries of "why did they cast this guy?" A battle near the end will
clear up any questions as to Mr. Gillen's worth in this film: bravo
fight coordinator! Just to make the unnecessarily complex plot more
unlikely (and I know how that sounds in a review of an action movie),
have our feckless friends also bump into and deeply influence one or
two other famous Brits of the time; it is an interesting and amusing
conceit to have two colonials have such an impact on the British, eh
pip pip, what?
Overall, however, Knights was a thin sequel to Noon. I don't know if
it is the writing or the long long stretches of not-much in between
plot movement and/or fight scenes, but something is missing. Sure,
there's a little wire work. Chan's earned it, by golly, and did I
mention he's still got it? Naturally it was still far, far better
than the Tuxedo, but still a disappointment.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These reviews (c) 2003 Karina Montgomery. Please feel free to forward
but just credit the reviewer in the text. Thanks.
reviews@cinerina.com
Check out previous reviews at:
http://www.cinerina.com
http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com - the Online Film Critics Society
http://www.hsbr.net/reviews/karina/listing.hsbr - Hollywood Stock
Exchange Brokerage Resource
http://www.mediamotions.com for 1999 releases
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 34314
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 849039
X-RT-TitleID: 1120269
X-RT-SourceID: 755
X-RT-AuthorID: 3661
X-RT-RatingText: 2.5/5
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.