CARRIE
3/5 stars
Date of Review: January 18th, 2004
REVIEW BY JOHN ULMER (Copyright, 2004)
The one thing that has haunted "Carrie" over the years is the most famous of
all questions: Is it any good? There's no doubting the film's legend and
popularity, but does it compare to the work of Alfred Hitchcock, or even a
low budget slasher flick like "Halloween"? In short...no, not really.
It's a good film, to a certain degree, but it fails as a horror movie on
more than one fundamental level (that being that it isn't scary). Some
people love the work of Brian De Palma, and some don't. His fans believe
that he is the next Hitchcock. Others think he is a poor man's rip-off.
Indeed, he does "borrow" quite a lot of pointers from Hitch in his films,
particularly "Carrie," from the soundtrack to the style of the film. This is
modern-day Hitchcock, complete with swearing and nudity too risque for the
likes of "Psycho." Perhaps, if Hitchcock were still alive, his films would
be like this. Maybe. I don't really know. I do think, though, that De
Palma's primary influence is definitely Alfred Hitchcock. Does he match his
idol? Not really. I felt that he was just copying him during a lot of
"Carrie." (Although I do love "Scarface" [1983] ever so much.)
One of the film's main flaws is Piper Laurie's mother figure in the film --
she comes off almost comical. Ironic, too, since Laurie herself was afraid
that would happen after reading the script. And after reading some of
Stephen King's novels myself, from "Misery" and "Cujo" and "Carrie" to "The
Running Man" (under alias Richard Bachman), I can safely say that the man
has a thwarted view of Christianity. As many people know, King is not
exactly the poster boy for happiness and a clean mind. But he's always
presented Christianity in his novels as that of heretics -- such as the
mother in both his novel and film adaptation of "Carrie," who believes that
growing "dirty pillows" and reaching puberty as a young woman is part of the
devil's taunting.
Obviously King holds a grudge against personal beliefs such as Christianity
(and probably other religions, too). I'm sure that he doesn't think he does,
but if you thumb through any of his books you can see very clearly that the
man is not one who appreciates many of the fine aspects of life, and is
very, very dark. His hatred towards religion probably stems from his own
personality.
Am I starting to sound like one of Stephen King's "Crazy Christians"? Sorry
about that. I get carried away sometimes. Basically, the point is this: I
can buy Piper Laurie's character in "Carrie" because I believe that there
must be a few individuals as crazy as herself in this world. But I can't buy
that every Christian in the world thinks puberty is the work of the devil. I
myself am a Christian. If I thought the world was run by Satan himself,
would I be writing movie reviews on secular films? No.
I have yet to meet someone like Margaret White (Laurie) from "Carrie." I
hope I never do. And in the film, her character is so over the top that she
does indeed come off quite silly as compared to the way she was supposed to
strike the audience -- menacing and terrifying. But she does instill fear in
her teenager daughter, Carrie (Sissy Spacek), who longs to form a public
life like everyone else, but is haunted by her mother's incessant rants
about the devil and such. She even locks Carrie up in a closet for hours on
end so that she can pray to God.
But when Carrie is invited to the school prom, she disobeys her mother's
commands and is delighted to be able to attend a public event with kids her
own age. Unfortunately, the prom goes awry when Chris (Nancy Allen) and
Billy (John Travolta, a year prior to his breakthrough in "Saturday Night
Fever") pour hog blood all over Carrie when she accepts her crown as Prom
Queen.
This is when Carrie snaps and unleashes her telekinetic powers upon her
small town, burning the school gymnasium and all those inside it, then
wandering the streets drenched in blood, causing road accidents and other
such tragic events.
But Carrie is not evil. That is what the film tries to tell us, at least,
and does a good job at doing so. The book is a bit different -- Carrie is a
fat, ugly girl; not slim and pretty like Spacek -- but for the most part, it
captures the same sense of empathy and innocence that the novel did. We
don't see the bad in what Carrie is doing. We see the revenge. Just like we
didn't think what Travis Bickle or Bill Foster did was necessarily anything
"bad," what Carrie does in the film seems justified by the end. That's the
only thing I can really credit this film for -- building a strong title
character. The rest is pretty routine and weak.
This movie is carried by Sissy Spacek's performance, and for that I give it
a solid recommendation. My mother met Spacek at a horse show in Virginia
once, right before she was up for an Oscar a few years back. (She even got
their encounter on videocassette.) In the heat of an Oscar race, one might
expect that Spacek wouldn't be caught dead in a place such as a horse
competition. Or one would expect her to at least look somewhat glamorous.
She didn't look glamorous. She looked absolutely normal. She was wearing
nothing but a modest winter coat and some dirty jeans. No makeup. No
bodyguards. No press. She was just standing there amongst the crowd. My
mother spotted here before anyone else, but didn't want to attract attention
to her, either. So she asked her quietly if it was she and her suspicions
were confirmed. Spacek had come to watch her daughter ride in the same
competition as my sister. "I loved you in 'Carrie,'" my mother told her.
And as she recalled the story to me, I thought, That's probably the
compliment Spacek gets the most. She's a great actress, and certainly an
honorable one. She's taken risky roles, such as that in "The Coal Miner's
Daughter," but has yet to succumb to the standards of Hollywood. I wouldn't
classify her as a mainstream actress. It's apparent that she hasn't had
plastic surgery yet like most actresses her age. I respect that. I respect
her work and her as an actress.
Sissy Spacek is the only thing that keeps "Carrie" from being another
run-of-the-mill horror film with a few good ideas and an empathetic title
character. The script is, for the most part, quite weak, and the acting
ranges from great (Spacek) to cliched (Allen as the nasty cheerleader). What
surprises me most about "Carrie" is the impact it had and how it boosted
Stephen King from being a lowly horror writer to his recent critically
proclaimed title as "The King of Horror." I don't think he is, but that's an
entirely different story.
- John Ulmer
Webmaster of The Movie Portal
http://www.wiredonmovies.com/
Updated daily, offers over one thousand free movie scripts and hundreds of
free reviews, plus posters, sounds, quotes, and more.
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 36827
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1240060
X-RT-TitleID: 1003625
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 3/5
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.