ARMY OF DARKNESS (1993)
Rating: 4/5 stars
REVIEW BY JOHN ULMER (Copyright, 2004)
His name is Ash. He is played by Bruce Campbell as the ever-reluctant,
tired hero who just wants to get home. "Army of Darkness" marks his
third adventure in the "Evil Dead" series, where he has found himself
trapped in a cabin with his girlfriend, attacked by risen skeletons,
and so on and so forth. Some people claim that "Evil Dead II" was
basically a remake of the original with some extra comedy -- what
Campbell describes as "splatstick," har-har. Campbell himself also
claims that "Army of Darkness" is nothing like its predecessors,
abandoning gore for silly slapstick laughs, not even riding the median
like the second film, but becoming a sort of all-out comedy (which it
really isn't). Campbell comes across as a mix between Hugh Jackman and
Jim Carrey--charismatic and able to contort his face into the
strangest shapes I've ever seen. In one sequence (which is actually
not really Campbell's complete face), Ash's entire head gets stretched
like rubber, and he has to shake off the effect to return to normal.
This particular scene evokes the limitless physical exploration of the
Looney Tunes characters. "Army of Darkness" is not a horror film. It's
not even really that much of a comedy, when you look past the surface.
It's very short, with the actual film itself clocking in at only 75
minutes (the credits, apparently, take up another seven, just barely
meeting the unofficial bare minimum of movie lengths). So what *is*
"Army of Darkness"? I'll quote another pretty famous movie: "You have
to see it for yourself."
Basically, it resurrects the one-handed Ash character from the
previous films (whose right arm happens to be a chainsaw). Campbell
claims that the film is entirely different from its predecessors, and
the only link is the skeletons and the hero. The similarities seem to
stop there.
It picks up right after the second film. Ash has been time-zapped back
to somewhere around 1300 A.D. Don't ask me why. There's something to
do with a Book of Dead, or something like that with a complicated
name, perhaps from the earlier films, perhaps not, and Ash has to find
it so he can be sent back to his own time. Why? Who knows? Like anyone
actually pays attention to a plot like this? The whole time travel
thing should be the first indication that you're not meant to be
analyzing it very deeply on a basis of reality. That being said, it's
still a load of fun. Just don't pay attention to the plot. Or the
acting. Or the special effects. Or the entire premise. Other than
that, it's great!
The movie was directed by Sam Raimi, whose best realistic outing has
been "A Simple Plan," and who met Campbell in the mid-'70s, at some
sort of pantomiming class ("He sucked, which may explain why he became
a director," Campbell explains). The two have reunited with many
projects, but their most famous collaboration has probably been "The
Evil Dead," which was released more than a decade before "Army" and
became a cult classic. Campbell became one of the most unusual heroes
of all time--wise-cracking, witty, brutal, and blunt. An everyday guy
who gets caught in the middle of something pretty big and relies on
one-liners to lighten the situation. As the sequels increased, the
humor grew, and by "Army of Darkness," Campbell's iconic hero had some
of the worst--but most suitable--lines ever spoken on-screen: "Gimme
some sugar, baby." "This is my boomstick!" "Groovy." That's only the
beginning. Sometimes, in this particular film, Campbell's self-aware
dialogue gets a bit annoying (especially when he starts speaking to
himself about what he's going to do and why, which is really for the
audience), but for the most part he delivers a performance that makes
or breaks the film. It makes it. Campbell is likable, a big-jawed
actor who just has the appearance of a rugged humorous action star.
He's got screen presence but doesn't take himself too seriously. "Army
of Darkness" is like taking a bunch of your friends out into a
Hollywood set and making a movie. It just looks like a lot of fun.
"Army of Darkness" was made with an $11 million budget and barely
recuperated its losses at the box office, where it raked in just over
that same amount in the US. Why the small reception? Perhaps the fact
that the film had been shelved for quite a while turned off some of
the fans. The trailer wasn't superb, either, giving the impression of
a very goofy comedy with action. Interestingly enough, that is sort of
what the movie is like, only...different.
"Army of Darkness" gained a huge cult following thereafter, becoming
the most statistically popular entry of the "Evil Dead" series, if not
the best (most people seem to think the second is the greatest). Its
technical aspects are horrible, yet it is considered a horror-comedy
classic. Why? What separates it from shelved disasters such as the
recent "Envy"? Probably because "Army of Darkness" is very self-aware.
It knows it's ridiculous, and likes to occasionally poke fun at its
own ideas.
The movie received some complaints when it was released. Some critics
found it childish and poor. That is true. The movie seems to appeal to
youngsters, but it also appeals to older individuals on deeper
levels--those who appreciate satires of horror films, with likable
lead heroes and silly subplots. Let's face it: "Army of Darkness" is
rather poorly made, at best. The dialogue is stiff. The plot is
ridiculous. The romance is absurd. The accents are dire. The creature
effects are corny and laughably inconsistent--one minute they're
stop-motion and the next minute they're played by humans walking
around in skeleton suits. (This was, after all, post-"Terminator 2,"
and quite incompetent.) It's all quite manipulative and silly--but it
makes for a good story mainly because of Ash. And let's face it: Even
though the very end is rather abrupt and cheesy, it's downright
satisfying, and we all laugh when Ash is asked, "Who the hell are
you?" by a possessed witch, and he replies, "The name's Ash.
Hardwares." So stupid but yet so funny. And that pretty much explains
the entire movie.
Notes: "Army of Darkness" has recently been re-released on yet another
DVD, this one a 2-disc "Boomstick Edition" with both the theatrical
cut and the extended director's cut, which features an added fifteen
minutes of footage and commentary by Campbell, Raimi and his brother
Ivan. A lot of the special features were taken from previous DVD
releases, such as the strict Director's Cut (for which the commentary
was originally recorded), and some of the trailers/documentaries,
etc., are also available on previous DVD releases. So far, "Boomstick"
is the best, but unless you don't own any of the previous releases,
it's really not worth the upgrade. There will probably be another
around the corner soon. And what is most unfortunate is that although
the DVD is satisfactory (especially if you don't own any other
releases of the film), much more could have been added, if Anchor Bay
was really interested in what fans want (such as the split Raimi and
Campbell commentary available on one of the earlier DVD releases). The
back of the DVD cover explains that it is being released yet again due
to popular demand by the fans. Which ones? Those who didn't already
buy the other six, seven, or however many DVDs are out there? It seems
that Anchor Bay is milking a cult movie for all its worth. And worst
of all, and what above all else indicates sloppy work and profit
interests, is a major typo on the back cover of the DVD. Here's a fun
game: See if you can spot it!
- John Ulmer
http://www.wiredonmovies.com
e-mail: johnulmer2003@msn.com
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 37846
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1283868
X-RT-TitleID: 1042254
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 4/5
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.