Josh Gilchrist's review of "Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over" Score= 63/100 * *
1/2
STARRING: Daryl Sabara, Ricardo Montalban, Sylvester Stallone, Alexa Vega,
Selma Hayek
DIRECTED AND WRITTEN BY Robert Rodriguez
89 MINUTES
MPAA RATING PG for action sequences and peril
Robert Rodriguez's imagination went into overdrive with the "Spy Kids"
franchise. Here was a well respected filmmaker who was putting his career on
hold to create something out of the ordinary, a family film franchise. In my
review of the original "Spy Kids" back in March of 2001, I praised the film
for strengthening creativity in children and showcasing a great moral about
the
importance of family.
The third, and supposedly the final, film in the franchise, "Spy Kids 3-D:
Game Over" is now in theaters, complete with it's own gimmick, the first
major 3-D release in twenty years. This automatically made me apprehensive.
I'm a fan of 3-D films but I the problem was that the film needed this kind
of a gimmick to hook an audience. Once an example of creativity, "Spy
Kids" has now run out of ideas and needs a ploy to keep it alive.
Also gone is the focus on family, the focus now is almost entirely on the
adventures of young Juni (Daryl Sabara), recruited by the spy agency to rescue
his sister Carmen (Alexa Vega) from inside a video game titled 'Game
Over.' The game has been devised by the Toymaker (Sylvestor Stallone, hamming
it up in three different roles) who plans to use the game to take over the
world. The kids who play the game will never escape, therefore Juni has only
12
hours to rescue his sister and stop the children of the world from playing it.
The film is lackluster because most of the stars of the other two films are
back, but only in bit parts. Antonio Banderas is back as the father but is
onscreen for about five minutes. The character the film concentrates upon most
is the least appealing of the bunch. Juni is neither interesting nor confident
enough to make a good hero.
I did take solace in the fact that Ricardo Montalban's character of
Grandfather is on full display. This is the only honest performance in the
film, brimming with wit and humor. Sadly, that's the only wit and humor in
the entire film.
Are the 3-D effects impressive? Not really. I have fond memories of watching
cheesy films like "The Mask," the 1961 film with Paul Stevens not the Jim
Carrey film. The problem is that the technology of 3-D hasn't improved.
I've seen older 3-D films which used the gimmick better than this film. To
add insult to injury, the film concentrates on using images that will benefit
from this lackluster 3-D imagery. That's antithetical of creativity and ideas
are squandered.
Is the film fun? Yes, for children I'm positive it is. There are even enough
parts to make parents laugh. But, when you think of the children, what are
they
taking away from this film? It's depressing to see that one of the few
franchises built on teaching lessons is now just a summer popcorn movie.
Nothing more. Nothing less.
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 35373
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1179245
X-RT-TitleID: 1124158
X-RT-AuthorID: 5858
X-RT-RatingText: 2.5/4
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.