LOST IN TRANSLATION
A film review by David N. Butterworth
Copyright 2003 David N. Butterworth
***1/2 (out of ****)
When culture shock looms large, two unlikely Americans in Tokyo find
mutual
comfort and companionship in Sofia Coppola's "Lost in Translation."
Bob Harris (Bill Murray) is a Hollywood movie star shooting a Japanese
whiskey commercial. Charlotte (Scarlett Johansson) is in town with her
workaholic
photographer who's shooting a rock band. Bob and Charlotte first exchange
shooting
glances--a smile--in an elevator filled with Japanese businessmen. The fact
that they tower over their co-riders is not lost to either of them.
But something *is* lost here. Bob's married with kids. Not so much
unhappily
as mundanely, perhaps. His children miss him but he senses he's not really
needed at home. His take-charge wife (whom we never see; I imagined someone
like Rita Wilson) faxes him in the middle of the night, insensitive to--or
grossly
unaware of--the time difference. She FedEx's him carpet samples for this
study,
indicating a preference for burgundy (they all look burgundy to Bob, or none
of them do). He calls his wife once in the middle of the night--his daughter
Zoë is refusing to eat breakfast--and realizes it was a bad idea. He can't
sleep.
Charlotte doesn't quite know what she does yet. A Yale grad married two
years to John (Giovanni Ribisi), she's tried writing but didn't like what she
wrote. Photography, of course--"all girls have their photography phase"--but
nothing currently. She loves her husband--she tells him so--but he seems
young,
distractible. And when a vivacious actress friend shows up in the lobby one
morning John is more distracted than usual, a fact that Charlotte doesn't fail
to notice. She takes in the local color--the ornate temples and shrines and
the neon lit business districts with their looming billboards and the noisy
video parlors--and she swims late, in the hotel pool. She can't sleep.
One sleepless night, Bob and Charlotte hook up in the hotel bar. And
it's
the beginning of one of the happiest, saddest, most genuine relationships ever
put on film.
With everything around them overwhelmingly alien--the language, the food,
the customs--Bob and Charlotte find normalcy and laughter and friendship in
each other's presence, a much needed connection in a sprawling metropolis
that,
like them, never sleeps.
In lesser films, the fact that Bob is in his mid-50s and Charlotte in her
early 20s would be significant, played upon. But it isn't here.
Writer/director
Coppola's bittersweet follow-up to "The Virgin Suicides," her stunning
directorial
debut of four years ago, is a superb achievement of subtlety and nuance.
While
some might be worried, even titillated, as to where this relationship is
heading,
Coppola isn't. She writes from the heart, giving her actors words to shape
and room to improvise. Murray, who's simply amazing, seems so natural you
wonder
if scripting his dialogue was ever a consideration. Johansson too is perfect,
reflecting just the right amount of beauty and innocence. Even when Bob and
Charlotte do kiss, in a climactic scene in which the characters share an
intimacy
that we, the audience, are not privy to (as it should be), it's touchingly
non-sexual,
much like the times when Charlotte places her head on Bob's shoulder, or Bob
places his hand on Charlotte's foot.
If voyeurism didn't have such negative sexual predator overtones I would
admit to wanting to watch Bob and Charlotte hang out together forever. Funny
and achingly poignant, "Lost in Translation" is an intelligent, beautifully
rendered film that provides no easy answers, either for its characters or the
viewer. It's Murray's best ever performance, and one of the year's best
films.
--
David N. Butterworth
dnb@dca.net
Got beef? Visit "La Movie Boeuf"
online at http://members.dca.net/dnb
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 35830
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1200243
X-RT-TitleID: 1125647
X-RT-SourceID: 878
X-RT-AuthorID: 1393
X-RT-RatingText: 3.5/4
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.