Movies A-Z | Celebs | SiteMap | DVD | Advanced Search
   Home
 
   Movie Database News    In Theaters    Coming Soon    Future Movies    BoxOffice     Trailers     Scripts     Wallpapers     Directory  
  Home -

Best in Show (2000) - movie notes

Best in Show (2000)

User Rating
80%
(140 votes)
OverviewCommentsDVDsPhotosForumProduction InfoProduction InfoAdd to MyMovies 

Quotes (29)
Trivia (10)
Plot Description
Soundtrack
Wallpapers
Shooting Locations
Popularity

Directed by
Christopher Guest

Written by
Christopher Guest, Eugene Levy

Cast
Jay Brazeau, Parker Posey, Michael Hitchcock, Catherine O'Hara, Eugene Levy [more]


Release Date
• USA: Sep 29, 2000
• UK: 9 Mar 2001
DVD Release Date
• R1: Feb 10, 2004
• R2: 10 Sep 2001

Budget $6,000,000

Official Website:
Best in Show Website

MPAA Rating
Rated PG-13 for language and sex-related material.

Running Time
1 hour, 30 minutes

Country USA

Studio Castle Rock Entertainment

More info on IMDb.com

Other Titles
• Best in Show
• Dog Show (1999)
• Dog Show! (2001)
• Dogumentary (1999)



Sign up for our Newsletter!
Movie news in your email:

Your Name:

Your E-Mail Address:




 Behind the Scenes

     About The Production
     On Location

On Location

advertisement

Best In Show was shot entirely on location in Vancouver, Canada and Los Angeles. The filmmakers assembled a cast of nearly 100 actors, including 20 principal roles and almost as many dogs, their owners and handlers, dog show coordinators, animal trainers and a professional film crew of 140.

For some of the principal actors, filming days were interspersed with dog show training sessions. Christopher Guest, Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, John Michael Higgins, Jane Lynch and Michael Hitchcock all had classes with their movie dogs and the film's Technical Advisor, Earlene Luke. Luke, a veteran all-breed professional handler, continues to give handling classes and is very well known in the dog show world.

Initially, Luke thought the idea of putting on a professional dog show with inexperienced actors was "some kind of unrealistic Hollywood fantasy." In her 30 years of experience in the American dog show industry she had never heard of such a thing being attempted. "I had grave doubts that they were going to be able to pull this off," she says.

"You just don't walk into a ring and run around it with your dog. There is a performance aspect to the whole thing which includes leash work, understanding rhythms, movement and much more...all of this with actors who have never had their hands on a show dog."

Compressing her normal eight-week course into five intensive days, Luke taught them the ins and outs of dog handling, from the ability to "stack" (arranging the dog in proper posture) to working with the coats of such breeds as Shih Tzus and Standard Poodles, which requires considerable manual finesse.

Among other things, the actors learned that different breeds have different walking rhythms, something Luke illustrates by using music. "All dogs have rhythm," says Luke, "and I figure out the music based on seeing them move. Some are waltz music, some are cha cha or rock and roll. It's fascinating to watch dogs when their music comes on because they know its time to start moving. Their handlers or owners just have to keep up."

In the final analysis, Luke was impressed with the actors' ability to capture the handling techniques. "They all did a very good job," says Luke, "especially given the time constraints. They also were very good about picking up things by watching other handlers and are excellent mimics. Their biggest challenge was to learn that they were the ones in control, not the dogs."

Working without a script naturally means that nobody really knows what the actors are going to say when the cameras roll. As John Michael Higgins points out, when the actors' dialogue is completely improvisational, the camera can never be turned off. "Sometimes, the first time you say something gives you the most realistic take," says Higgins. "And that's the one you want."

Eugene Levy feels the improvisational tone set by the filmmakers gives the actors an extraordinary sense of creative freedom. "In a normal film, when you do the whole wide coverage of a scene, you're doing the lines and repeating them the same way when you go in to do the tighter shots, the two shots, and the singles and so on," he says.

Next page


Pages: [1] 2 3 4

 Awards

  • Nominated for 2001 Golden Globes Award for Best Motion Picture - Comedy/Musical






 Recommended Movies
Movie Title Agree Disagree
Pecker (1998)
Man of the Year (1995)
Monster (2003)
Dawn of the Dead (1978)
Waiting for Guffman (1996)
Rocky (1976)
Cruel Intentions (1999)
Rocky III (1982)

Help us improve these results!
Mark the movies you think are similar by putting a checkmark under 'Agree' and hit Submit. Leave blank those you are not sure about.


Mooviees.com is not the official site for this film.
All editorial views and opinions expressed here are for entertainment purposes only. <>



DVD | Home | BoxOffice | All Celebs | All Movies | Release Schedule | In Production | In Theaters
Coming Soon | Future Movies | Trailers | Scripts | Wallpapers | Directory | Advanced Search | Knihy
Copyright ©2002 Mooviees.com All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.