FROM HELL (2001)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia
October 26th, 2001
Jack Ripper is known for being the notorious serial killer of the 19th century
who was never caught ("I invented the 20th century"). A slew of films and books
have theorized on the identity of the killer, ranging from some unknown peasant
to someone connected to the Royal Family. "From Hell," based on the graphic
novel of the same name by Alan Moore III, makes the case that someone from the
Royal Family might have been the Ripper. Though it is a mystery that is somewhat
compelling, it fails miserably to gain our interest.
Set in 1888, "From Hell" stars Johnny Depp as the real-life Inspector George
Abberline, an laudanum addict who has visions of the future (in real-life, he
was a portly man who looked nothing like Depp). Apparently, some of Abberline's
visions involve Jack the Ripper's murderous rampage in the slum area of
Whitechapel, located on the East End of London. It is a city that is dark, dank
and oozes corruption and menace on every corner. Murder is also a commodity in
this town but this Ripper is no ordinary murderer. He kills prostitutes and
"removes their livelihood," in rather grisly, gruesome ways. Inspector Abberline
is convinced that it is no peasant or poverty-stricken individual - it is an
educated man of some esteem and possibly a surgeon due to the dexterous manner
in which the victims were butchered.
Abberline notices several details in the murder of these prostitutes. The most
telling detail is the roots of grapes left behind, a tactic used by the killer
to lure the victim. Also, the knifes used might have been surgical tools. This
would mean that a surgeon could be responsible for the murders, considering they
took place in the dark where he would instinctively know how to perform his
handiwork. One prostitute that might be able to help Abberline in his search is
redheaded Mary Kelly (Heather Graham) who was well acquainted with the slain
prostitutes. Still, this relationship develops into an unconvincing love story
that simply marks time.
Most of "From Hell" is in-your-face with little grace or style. The directors
are the Hughes Brothers, responsible for the nightmarish classic "Menace II
Society." That film was harsh and offputting but for a justifiable purpose, to
place us in the unpredictable chaos of living in a ghetto where a gunshot was as
frequent as a car noise. "From Hell" needed some space to breathe and perhaps a
degree of elegance to tell such a compelling story. Instead, we have Abberline's
dreams which consist of green-tinted, jump-cutted nightmares of cobblestones and
blood. The cinematography is so dark and often out-of-focus that it is hard to
discern what is happening half the time. The washed-out, desaturated color
schemes are becoming a frequent style in films nowadays but here, it smacks of
mediocrity. Black-and-white would serve the story better, a Universal Gothic
approach a la Tod Browning's "Dracula."
Frankly, the pacing of "From Hell" is laborious and disconnected. I could swear
I was almost ready to fall asleep at times, but the film picks up when the focus
is on the grisly investigation. That comes in too little and too late. Part of
the problem is that Johnny Depp and Heather Graham are so devoid of life and
magnetism that they bored me whenever they appeared on screen. At least, the
great Ian Holm saves the day with some core of integrity as Sir William Gull, a
doctor for the Royal Family. He breathes some life into the story when he shows
up. Robbie Coltrane is also a delight as Sergeant Peter Godley who loves to
smack Abberline out of his druggy states.
"From Hell" is a rather vivid title for a listless, lifeless film. There is no
soul, no fire, no hell. It simply starts and sputters but never feels as unified
or as compelling as the real tale. It just feels ripped apart from the truth.
For more reviews, check out JERRY AT THE MOVIES at
http://moviething.com/members/movies/faust/JATMindex.shtml
E-mail me with any questions, comments or complaints at faustus_08520@yahoo.com
or at Faust668@aol.com
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 29991
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 260067
X-RT-TitleID: 1110176
X-RT-SourceID: 875
X-RT-AuthorID: 1314
NOTE: This review was posted on the usenet
to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup.
Mooviees.com accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review.
Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.